FINALLY! I am so happy to be discussing this topic in detail
now, but really feel that this discussion is long overdue. We have been
creating work for 10 months without much direction in the way of copyright
issues. This also goes along with my feeling that we have never really
discussed privacy and security on the Internet. I am wondering what the
rationale is for either not discussing these topics or leaving them until the
end of the program?
Ok, on to the topic at hand. The resources provided were
great and I especially liked the film Good
Copy Bad Copy. Copyright was meant to protect products and the rights of
their creator. It was interesting to
hear about the international views on copyright. In Nigeria, copyright is not about stopping
people from using your work, but for getting people to pay you to use your
work. In Sweden there were not any laws,
which meant that the Pirate Bar could operate and a political party was
created…the Pirate Party to protect privacy rights. They see it as file sharing
and not copyright infringement. I LOVED
the Bush and Blair music video…hysterical and creative. I had to look it up.
Another significant aspect of the video
was the almost cavalier attitude exhibited about an artist's property.
While the idea of new "art forms" comes into play (eg. Girl
Talk and also the Grey Album), it seems there should be some kind of an
agreement that makes it easier to get permission to use content and also to
reward the artist with royalties. A global solution is surely needed
where everybody wins; artist, consumer/user of the copyrighted material, and
the publisher.
With regard to Fair Use, it is interesting that "Fair Use" is not so much a legal tort but, instead, a platform where one can defend the use of copyrighted material. I also realized the learning component requirement tied to the Fair Use argument places a burden on the user of the material to prove that the lesson could not have been completed without the use of the copyrighted material. Thank goodness I always show movies that enhance my lesson plans.
With regard to Fair Use, it is interesting that "Fair Use" is not so much a legal tort but, instead, a platform where one can defend the use of copyrighted material. I also realized the learning component requirement tied to the Fair Use argument places a burden on the user of the material to prove that the lesson could not have been completed without the use of the copyrighted material. Thank goodness I always show movies that enhance my lesson plans.
The access to media means that there must be a new way to
think of copyrights. People want to be paid for their creations, but relying on
a very strict copyright law can stymie creativity. Freedom, sharing and collaboration will spur
innovation and allow the invention of new art forms and types of expression. I mean, who would have thought that Bush and Blair could sound as amazing as Lionel Richie and Diana Ross?
Great overview and summary of the "reading" material. Love the Blair/Bush video. I think that you nailed it, noting the cavalier attitude, but it's not just the remixers, but everyone is upset and instead of being able to think through this problem, so that artists are compensated, but, excuse the saying, everyone has their panties in a bunch and they want someone to suffer, etc., etc., etc. Ack.
ReplyDelete